Luxury manufacturing is increasingly being evaluated on more than design, heritage, and brand equity. It is now assessed on how responsibly materials are sourced, how transparently supply chains are governed, how industrial sites manage energy and emissions, and how seriously companies engage with environmental and social risk.

For luxury watchmaking, these questions cut particularly deep.

A mechanical watch is a materially intensive product. It contains hundreds of components produced through advanced and often energy-intensive processes. It depends on precious metals, specialised alloys, ceramics, lubricants, and, in many cases, gemstones. Its supply chain stretches from mining and refining through high-precision manufacturing and global servicing networks. While production volumes are small compared to mass consumer industries, expectations are much higher. Customers increasingly associate luxury not only with performance and aesthetics, but with durability, provenance, and responsible business conduct.

At the same time, the sector is facing mounting pressure across several fronts:

Environmental and human-rights risks associated with gold, platinum, palladium, and diamonds
Energy use and emissions from advanced manufacturing facilities
Regulatory scrutiny on traceability, due diligence, and climate targets
Growing consumer expectations around repairability, longevity, and long-term value

In this environment, sustainability for a luxury manufacturer cannot sit only in packaging decisions or annual reporting cycles. It is increasingly defined by how products are designed, how long they last, how factories are built, how suppliers are governed, and how responsibility is framed over decades rather than quarters.

Rolex’s own carbon accounting underlines the challenge. In its 2023 reporting, the company puts its total footprint at 1,996 kt CO₂e, and notes that 99% sits in Scope 3, driven largely by the procurement of precious materials including gold, platinum, palladium, and silver. This framing is important because it signals where the real sustainability leverage must sit: upstream sourcing and procurement choices, not only operational efficiency.

Rolex occupies a distinctive position within this shift. The company is privately owned by the Hans Wilsdorf Foundation, operates one of the most vertically integrated industrial models in the luxury sector, and has built its global reputation not around rapid product cycles, but around consistency, precision, and longevity.

In 2023, Rolex published its first public Sustainability Report. The document formalised governance structures, outlined emissions targets, described traceability systems, and disclosed the company’s priority sustainability topics. It marked an important step toward external transparency. It also reinforced that Rolex’s sustainability story is not primarily a reporting story. It is rooted in longevity as a design principle, stewardship as a corporate mindset, and scientific support as a strategic choice.

Longevity as a sustainability lever

From its founding in 1905, Rolex has framed durability as a core value. Hans Wilsdorf’s ambition was not to produce fashionable accessories, but reliable instruments. That mindset continues to shape how Rolex designs, manufactures, and services its watches today.

Jean-Frédéric Dufour, Chief Executive Officer of Rolex SA, has consistently framed longevity as a responsibility than a brand attribute.

“Since its creation, Rolex has been driven by a passion: to design and manufacture watches that stand the test of time. The quest for quality and excellence, the foundation of our philosophy, has always required us to operate in a responsible and sustainable way.”

From a sustainability perspective, this focus on endurance has direct environmental relevance. The ecological footprint of a mechanical watch is overwhelmingly concentrated in upstream stages, including the extraction and refining of precious metals, the manufacturing of micro-engineered components, and the construction and operation of specialised industrial facilities. Once produced, a mechanical watch requires no external energy to operate. Its sustainability profile therefore depends heavily on how long it remains functional, maintained, and valued.

Rolex has built a business system around this reality. That system includes:

Design for longevity, with movements engineered for stability, precision, and serviceability
A global servicing infrastructure, including internal and authorised service centres worldwide
Long-term spare-parts commitments, with Rolex guaranteeing parts for at least 35 years after a model is discontinued, and manufacturing components beyond that when required
A professional repair economy, supported by nearly 1,900 people qualified to provide after-sales service globally

Rolex also quantifies the scale of this model. The company reports that it reconditions around 450,000 watches every year, supported by an after-sales organisation of 3,550 employees worldwide. In sustainability terms, that volume matters because it shows longevity is not only product design, but an operating system built to keep watches in use.

This infrastructure allows Rolex watches to remain in active use for decades, often across generations. From an environmental standpoint, this fundamentally reshapes the impact equation. A product designed and supported to function for half a century distributes its embedded material, energy, and emissions footprint across a far longer useful life than almost any modern consumer good. It also reduces replacement demand, tempers consumption intensity, and embeds circularity into the product system through maintenance, restoration, and continuity rather than disposal.

This orientation is reinforced by Rolex’s ownership structure. The company has been owned by the Hans Wilsdorf Foundation since 1945. Without public shareholders and quarterly earnings expectations, Rolex is not structurally driven toward short-cycle growth or accelerated product turnover. This allows sustainability strategies to be framed around industrial resilience, long-term capital investment, and institutional continuity rather than near-term signalling.

Longevity, in this sense, is not simply a brand attribute. It functions as a corporate operating principle shaping product design, manufacturing investment, workforce development, and environmental strategy.

💡 Longevity is Rolex’s primary sustainability mechanism. By engineering watches to function across generations and building a global ecosystem to support maintenance and restoration, Rolex turns product lifespan into an environmental lever. In an industry where impact is largely embedded at the point of production, endurance becomes a material sustainability strategy.

Craft at industrial scale

Rolex’s manufacturing footprint combines traditional watchmaking craft with highly advanced industrial systems.

The company operates four major industrial sites in Switzerland covering the full spectrum of watchmaking:

Acacias, Geneva – headquarters functions, research and development, final assembly, testing laboratories, and global servicing operations
Plan-les-Ouates – case and bracelet manufacturing, machining, surface treatment, and finishing
Chêne-Bourg – dial manufacturing, ceramic components, gem-setting, and gemmology
Bienne – full movement manufacturing, producing hundreds of components for each calibre

Rolex has also acquired a 100,000 m² plot in Bulle to develop a next-generation industrial facility. In its reporting, Rolex describes the future Bulle site as covering nearly 200,000 m², with sustainability criteria integrated into design and construction, and an ambition for the project to be operational around 2029.

This vertically integrated structure means Rolex designs and controls many of the most environmentally significant stages of its value chain. It casts its own gold alloys, machines and finishes its own components, assembles and tests its own movements, and operates its own servicing infrastructure.

From a sustainability standpoint, this integration is strategically significant:

Environmental impacts related to energy, waste, water, and chemicals are largely internalised rather than outsourced
Manufacturing improvements can be implemented directly rather than negotiated across fragmented supplier networks
Responsibility becomes inseparable from industrial performance and capital planning

The scale of this commitment is substantial. Rolex employs 15,548 people worldwide, with around 80 percent based in Switzerland. Between 2007 and 2027, the company is investing CHF 6.4 billion in capital goods, production machinery, and industrial buildings across its Swiss operations. Rolex also reports running around 150 internal sustainability projects, spanning facilities, processes, packaging, product development, and supply-chain systems.

This context matters. Sustainability at Rolex is not framed as a marginal initiative. It is increasingly positioned as a long-term industrial transformation effort.

Manufacturing responsibility and climate governance

Rolex’s 2023 Sustainability Report reflects a formalisation of environmental governance that has historically existed implicitly within its industrial culture.

Over the past few years, Rolex has:

Created an Impact and Sustainability Department reporting to the CEO
Established a Sustainability Strategy Committee and an external Sustainability Advisory Council
Integrated sustainability operations committees across business divisions
Completed its first formal materiality analysis

Rolex has identified priority environmental topics including climate change, energy efficiency, water management, air pollution, waste, and biodiversity protection.

In 2023, Rolex completed its third full carbon footprint analysis and formalised emissions-reduction targets aligned with the Science Based Targets initiative. The company has committed to:

Reducing absolute Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions by 42 percent by 2030 (vs. 2021)
Reducing absolute Scope 3 emissions by 25 percent by 2030 (vs. 2021)

Rolex’s report also includes several operational indicators. Across its sites, the company discloses annual electricity consumption of 134,214 MWh, solar installations totalling 10,687 m², producing around 1,455 MWh per year, and documented energy savings of 1,818 MWh at its Geneva sites. In Bienne, Rolex reports replacing gas boilers with pellet boilers, using roughly 1,000 tonnes of wood per year, sourced from Swiss forests in the Jura and Fribourg cantons.

For a vertically integrated manufacturer whose environmental impacts sit largely in facilities, materials, and industrial processes, these targets place manufacturing performance at the centre of the climate strategy.

Facilities investment is therefore a critical lever. Rolex’s long-term capital programme includes upgrading production sites, improving energy efficiency, modernising equipment, and embedding sustainability criteria into new construction. Alongside infrastructure, Rolex is introducing environmental considerations into its design and innovation processes through life-cycle analysis tools, eco-design training, and cross-functional sustainability platforms.

Here, sustainability is being positioned less as a parallel agenda and more as an extension of how watches are conceived, manufactured, and supported over their full life cycles.

Supply chain responsibility and traceability systems

Sourcing represents one of the most sensitive sustainability issues for luxury brands. Gold, platinum, palladium, and diamonds are associated with environmental degradation, human-rights risks, and geopolitical complexity.

In 2023, Rolex formalised its Responsible Purchasing Policy and rolled out its Sustainable Development Charter for suppliers, service providers, and partners. Rolex reports that 1,269 suppliers have now signed the charter, covering 98 percent of purchasing turnover with suppliers identified as presenting ESG risk.

Rolex also notes that 96 percent of direct product-related purchases are made in Switzerland, with most of the remainder coming from neighbouring European countries. That regional concentration does not remove upstream mining risk, but it does suggest tighter supplier proximity and stronger oversight.

The company has developed structured governance systems including:

Dedicated Precious Metals and Precious Stones Committees
Supply-chain mapping and risk matrices aligned with Swiss and European regulations
Digital traceability initiatives for diamonds and precious metals
External audits, alert mechanisms, and escalation protocols

Rolex does not claim full upstream transparency, acknowledging the inherent complexity of precious-materials supply chains. Instead, it frames traceability as an evolving governance system designed to progressively reduce risk, increase visibility, and strengthen accountability.

Sustainability in product development

Rolex has begun to formalise sustainability within its design and innovation processes. The Sustainability Report references:

Introduction of life-cycle analysis methodologies
Launch of eco-design projects
Training programmes for creators and industrialisation managers
Development of cross-disciplinary sustainability platforms

Eco-design in luxury watchmaking rarely manifests as visible “green products.” Instead, it influences material choices, component durability, manufacturing yields, energy and water use in production, packaging systems, and logistics efficiency.

Rather than positioning sustainability as a separate product category, Rolex is embedding it into how watches are designed, engineered, manufactured, distributed, and serviced. This approach aligns closely with the company’s broader philosophy, where sustainability is treated as a dimension of quality rather than a marketing feature.

Perpetual Planet and scientific stewardship

If Rolex’s industrial sustainability is grounded in longevity, its external environmental engagement is anchored in science.

The Perpetual Planet initiative consolidates decades of Rolex support for exploration, environmental research, and conservation into a structured platform focused on oceans, climate, and biodiversity. Rolex currently supports more than 30 explorers, scientists, and environmental programmes worldwide.

These partnerships span:

Ocean science and marine protection, including long-standing collaboration with Mission Blue
Field research and ecosystem mapping, in partnership with the National Geographic Society
Coral reef restoration, through support of Coral Gardeners, which has already seen more than 100,000 corals replanted
Climate, polar, forest, and biodiversity research, supporting long-term data collection and ecosystem monitoring

Dr. Sylvia Earle, marine biologist and founder of Mission Blue, has highlighted the importance of Rolex’s long-standing partnership.

“Collaboration with Rolex has been of incalculable value to my efforts to support the expeditions for the Mission Blue programme.”

Rather than framing these programmes as offsets or short-term environmental campaigns, Rolex positions them as long-term investments in scientific knowledge, field research, and ecosystem protection. For Rolex, environmental stewardship is closely tied to scientific capacity.

💡Rolex treats scientific research as a sustainability asset. Through Perpetual Planet, Rolex directs resources into long-term environmental research rather than short-cycle campaigns. By supporting oceanography, biodiversity science, and ecosystem monitoring, the company positions scientific knowledge itself as a strategic contribution to sustainability.

Disclosure and stewardship

Rolex’s first public Sustainability Report represents an important evolution. It formalises governance, introduces climate targets, and articulates supply-chain and environmental frameworks.

At the same time, Rolex remains atypical within the ESG landscape. Granular operational datasets are still limited. Product-level environmental footprints are not disclosed. Independent impact evaluation of conservation partnerships remains modest.

This limits comparability. But Rolex’s sustainability model reflects a different hierarchy of drivers, one that emphasises product endurance, institutional continuity, industrial control, and scientific partnership over near-term signalling.

The company openly frames its sustainability journey as evolving. What differentiates Rolex is not the absence of ESG systems, but the primacy it gives to long-term stewardship.

What Rolex represents strategically

Rolex offers a case study in an alternative sustainability narrative.

It suggests that:

Longevity can function as a meaningful environmental strategy
Manufacturing responsibility begins with industrial ownership and control
Supply-chain ethics require deep governance, not surface commitments
Scientific support can form a legitimate pillar of corporate sustainability

Rolex’s sustainability story is not built around quarterly ESG metrics. It is built around durability, stewardship, scientific investment, and the belief that protecting the natural world is inseparable from protecting the future of human achievement.

For a company whose products are engineered to outlast their first owners, this long view may be its most defining sustainability asset.

Subscribe to our newsletter for more insights, case studies, and ESG intelligence.

Explore ESG Solutions on our marketplace - OneStop ESG Marketplace.

Keep abreast of the top ESG Events on OneStop ESG Events.

OneStop ESG Educate: Your go-to source for top ESG courses and training programs tailored to your needs.

Stay informed with the latest insights on OneStop ESG News.

Discover meaningful career opportunities on OneStop ESG Jobs.