On May 23, 2025, the European Commission assigned 44 oil and gas companies the task of developing 50 million tonnes of annual CO₂ storage capacity by 2030, a key pillar of the EU’s Net-Zero Industry Act and Industrial Carbon Management Strategy. This mandate, tied to each firm’s 2020-2023 production, aims to decarbonize heavy industries like cement and steel, which account for 30% of EU emissions. By designating storage sites as Net-Zero Strategic Projects, the EU offers fast-tracked permits and funding. But with only five years to scale a nascent industry, can these firms deliver, and will flexibility in partnerships be enough to meet the ambitious target?

The Mandate Explained

The EU’s Delegated Regulation, effective from July 2025 after a two-month review by the European Parliament and Council, requires these 44 companies—listed in Annex 1 of Regulation 2024/1735—to provide CO₂ injection capacity proportional to their crude oil and natural gas output. The 50 million tonne target equals 10% of the EU’s 500 million tonnes of industrial emissions in 2023, focusing on hard-to-abate sectors. Exemptions in Annex 2 cover minor producers, ensuring fairness.

Companies have flexibility under Article 23(5): they can build storage solo, form consortia, or partner with third-party developers. Storage sites, primarily depleted oil and gas fields or saline aquifers, gain Net-Zero Strategic Project status, unlocking ETS Innovation Fund grants—€20 billion available through 2030—and streamlined permitting, cutting approval times from 24 to 12 months. Firms must submit detailed plans by mid-2026, outlining capacity, timelines, and methods, with non-compliance risking fines up to €200 per tonne of shortfall.

“Oil and gas firms, having fueled emissions, now have a role in storing CO₂,” said Kurt Vandenberghe, Director General for Climate Action. “This is about accountability and action.”

Read more: U.S. Air Force’s Multi-Fuel Tech Push Bolsters Energy Resilience

Why It Matters?

Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is critical for the EU’s 2050 net-zero goal. Heavy industries, emitting 1.5 billion tonnes of CO2 yearly across Europe, face limited renewable options. CCS can cut 50% of cement and 30% of steel emissions, per the IEA. The EU’s 2030 target—55% emissions reduction from 1990—requires 280 million tonnes of CO2 storage capacity, with this mandate covering 18%. It builds on initiatives like the EU’s $1.1 billion hydrogen push and JPMorgan’s $90 million CO2 removal deal, signaling a shift toward engineered solutions.

The mandate also repositions oil and gas firms as climate players. The sector, employing 1.2 million in the EU, faces declining demand—oil use down 10% since 2019. CCS offers a new revenue stream, with storage fees projected at €50-100 per tonne, creating a €5 billion market by 2030. Projects like Norway’s Northern Lights, storing 1.5 million tonnes yearly, show viability, with 80% of EU storage potential in North Sea reservoirs.

Challenges and Opportunities

Scaling CCS is daunting. Europe’s current capacity is 2 million tonnes annually, needing a 25-fold increase in five years. Developing a storage site—drilling wells, building pipelines—costs €500 million to €1 billion, per McKinsey, requiring €25-50 billion total investment. Infrastructure lags: only 1,000 km of CO2 pipelines exist versus 300,000 km for gas. The EU’s TEN-E program plans 5,000 km by 2030, but delays are common.

Technical risks persist. Storage sites must ensure 99.9% CO2 retention over 1,000 years, per EU standards, but leaks, though rare (0.01% risk), could undermine credibility. Public opposition, seen in 60% of Germans rejecting onshore storage, favors offshore sites like those in the North Sea, per a 2024 Eurobarometer poll. Smaller firms may struggle with capital, though partnerships with majors like Equinor or Shell, who run projects like Sleipner (1 million tonnes stored yearly), could bridge gaps.

Flexibility is a strength. Consortia, like the Porthos project in Rotterdam (2.5 million tonnes by 2026), pool resources. Third-party developers, backed by funds like BlackRock’s $1 billion CCS portfolio, offer expertise. The ETS Innovation Fund, disbursing €4 billion in 2024, covers 40% of project costs, while carbon prices (€80/tonne in 2025) incentivize capture.

Explore OneStop ESG Marketplace: Carbon capture

What’s Next?

By 2026, firms must finalize plans, with first sites operational by 2028 to meet 2030 quotas. The EU’s Industrial Carbon Management Forum, launched in 2025, will coordinate cross-border storage, targeting 20 projects like Denmark’s Greensand (8 million tonnes yearly). National funds, like Germany’s €3 billion CCS subsidy, bolster efforts. Globally, the U.S.’s $12 billion CCS investment and Canada’s $170/tonne carbon tax by 2030 show parallel momentum, but Europe’s mandate is uniquely aggressive.

The regulation dovetails with other EU policies. Assent’s CBAM compliance tool aids emission tracking, while Converge’s AI concrete platform cuts construction emissions, together reducing demand for CCS. Yet, as a Penn State study warns, fossil fuel production caps may still be needed to hit net-zero, given oil and gas’s 50% share of EU energy.

“This is a pivotal step,” Vandenberghe said. “We’re turning fossil fuel legacies into climate solutions.”

Success hinges on execution—securing funds, building pipelines, and winning public trust. If the 44 firms deliver, Europe could lead the global CCS race, storing CO2 at scale. If they falter, the 2030 target risks slipping, leaving heavy industries exposed. Will this mandate spark a green transformation, or buckle under logistical strain?

Explore ESG Solutions on our marketplace - OneStop ESG Marketplace.

Keep abreast of the top ESG Events on OneStop ESG Events.

OneStop ESG Educate: Your go-to source for top ESG courses and training programs tailored to your needs.