In a move that underscores Washington’s shifting stance on climate and financial policy, the Federal Reserve, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) have officially withdrawn their joint Principles for Climate-Related Financial Risk Management, a framework created in 2023 to guide major banks in managing climate-related financial exposure. The decision effectively dismantles one of the few formal mechanisms within the U.S. regulatory system aimed at integrating climate risk into banking oversight, signaling a broad retreat from environmental considerations in financial governance under the current administration.

From Risk Management to Retrenchment

The rescinded framework was originally designed for banks with over $100 billion in consolidated assets, providing guidance on how to assess both physical risks such as damage from extreme weather and transition risks, including the economic impacts of moving toward a low-carbon economy. The 2023 framework, jointly issued by the Fed, FDIC, and OCC, reflected a growing global consensus that climate-related shocks pose real threats to financial stability. It emphasized the need for institutions to identify, measure, monitor, and control their exposure to climate risks not as a political directive, but as part of sound risk management and fiduciary duty.

Now, in their joint statement, the three regulators said they “do not believe principles for managing climate-related financial risk are necessary”, arguing that banks are already subject to comprehensive safety and soundness standards that adequately cover all forms of financial risk. In an internal memo to Fed staff, the Board added that “the Climate Principles may be distracting large financial institutions from the management of material financial risks.”

The statement marks a decisive policy shift away from treating climate change as a material systemic risk, a position that had become mainstream among central banks and regulators worldwide over the past decade.

READ MORE: Airbus and Siemens Partner to Decarbonize Industrial Sites Across the U.S. and U.K.

Part of a Broader Rollback of Climate Governance

The withdrawal of the climate risk framework follows a series of reversals on environmental policy and financial oversight since the start of President Donald Trump’s administration. Within days of the inauguration in January, the Federal Reserve withdrew from the Network of Central Banks and Supervisors for Greening the Financial System (NGFS), a global coalition that fosters research and cooperation on climate-related financial stability issues. The administration has also rolled back or deprioritized sustainability initiatives across federal agencies from environmental disclosure rules to renewable energy incentives while openly dismissing the scientific consensus on climate change.

In a September address at the United Nations, President Trump reiterated his stance, calling climate change “the greatest con job ever perpetrated on the world.”

Internal Division and Dissent Within the Fed

The decision to rescind the principles passed by a 5–2 vote among Federal Reserve Board members, highlighting internal divisions over how to balance political directives and risk oversight. Governor Michael Barr, one of the two dissenting votes and the Fed’s Vice Chair for Supervision, issued a pointed rebuke following the announcement:

“Revoking the principles as climate-related financial risks increase defies logic and sound risk management practices. The rescission contains literally no evidence to support taking this step only two years after putting the principles into effect. We owe the public a rational, evidence-based explanation for our actions, and this rescission fails that test.”

Barr’s dissent reflects concerns shared by a number of central bankers and economists who warn that ignoring climate-related risk could increase systemic vulnerability in the U.S. financial system, particularly as physical climate impacts intensify.

Industry and Global Reaction

Financial institutions have been split in their reactions. Some of the country’s largest banks privately expressed relief at reduced political scrutiny, while others particularly those with significant international operations worry the decision could isolate U.S. regulators from global standards. In Europe and Asia, climate-related stress testing, disclosure requirements, and capital adequacy considerations are now common practice. By contrast, the U.S. move represents a sharp divergence from frameworks used by the European Central Bank (ECB), Bank of England, and Monetary Authority of Singapore, all of which view climate risk as integral to financial supervision. Economists note that this divergence could complicate cross-border regulatory cooperation and increase the cost of capital for U.S. banks operating in climate-sensitive markets.

Implications for Climate Risk and Financial Stability

Critics warn that dismantling the climate risk framework leaves a gap in the U.S. banking system’s ability to anticipate and mitigate exposure to climate-driven shocks from insured losses tied to hurricanes and floods to stranded assets in fossil fuel portfolios. By retreating from climate-informed risk management, regulators risk underestimating systemic vulnerabilities, particularly in sectors heavily exposed to weather extremes, real estate, and energy transition volatility. Without standardized guidance, banks may continue to take disparate approaches to climate risk assessment, creating uneven oversight and potential blind spots within the broader financial system.

Explore OneStop ESG Marketplace: Regulation and Compliance

A Turning Point for U.S. Financial Climate Policy

The rescission of the Climate Principles symbolizes more than an administrative rollback, it represents a fundamental shift in how the United States defines financial prudence in the age of climate change. While global markets increasingly embed environmental risk into investment and lending practices, the U.S. appears poised to de-link climate and finance, even as physical climate impacts accelerate domestically.

As Governor Barr cautioned, “The risks are not going away simply because we stop acknowledging them.”

Whether the decision proves to be a temporary detour or a lasting divergence will depend on future leadership at the Fed and on how quickly the financial consequences of climate inaction make themselves felt on the balance sheets of America’s largest banks.

Explore ESG Solutions on our marketplace - OneStop ESG Marketplace.

Keep abreast of the top ESG Events on OneStop ESG Events.

OneStop ESG Educate: Your go-to source for top ESG courses and training programs tailored to your needs.

Stay informed with the latest insights on OneStop ESG News.

Discover meaningful career opportunities on OneStop ESG Jobs.