Researchers have identified how small structural differences inside two humidity-sensitive polymers can significantly affect how efficiently they remove carbon dioxide from the air. The finding offers a clearer path for developing low-energy carbon capture materials by showing that internal pore structure and moisture response play a decisive role in how quickly the materials trap and release CO2.

The importance of the work lies in its relevance to one of the biggest challenges in direct air capture. Most carbon removal systems still depend on heat or pressure to release captured carbon dioxide, which increases energy demand and cost. Moisture-driven systems offer a different model, using changes in humidity rather than high energy inputs to switch between capture and release.

Moisture Acts as the Trigger for Carbon Release

The research focused on two commercial polymers whose performance changes with humidity. Under dry conditions, active sites in the materials bind carbon dioxide in one chemical form. As moisture rises, water reshapes the internal chemical environment, shifting the balance toward another form and triggering the release of CO2.

This humidity-driven process, often described as a moisture swing, is especially promising because it relies on wet and dry air cycles instead of conventional thermal regeneration. That gives it potential as a lower-energy route for carbon removal, particularly if the materials can be refined for faster operation and stronger durability.

Read more: UK–Saudi Collaboration Advances Climate-Focused Earth Observation Mission Design

Internal Structure Determines Performance

The study found that one material, IRA-900, performed better than the other because its structure was more open and offered more pathways for gas and water movement. It captured more carbon dioxide and began doing so more quickly than FAA-3. At the same time, its advantage was not identical across every phase of the cycle, which showed that performance depends on more than simple openness alone.

Imaging and structural analysis revealed that humidity changed the internal arrangement of both materials. As moisture increased, the polymers swelled and then relaxed again as the air dried. But inside the materials, smaller molecular distances behaved differently, tightening in some areas as water reorganised the structure. In IRA-900, pores, clustering, and layered internal patterns created extra channels that appeared to improve carbon dioxide transport.

Water Movement and Carbon Movement Do Not Behave the Same Way

One of the more useful conclusions from the work is that water uptake and carbon dioxide movement are not automatically improved by the same structural features. Water entered and exited both materials at nearly the same pace, even though their visible structures were quite different. Carbon dioxide, however, behaved differently, with IRA-900 releasing and recapturing it more efficiently.

This distinction matters for future material design. It suggests that researchers cannot simply optimise for greater porosity or faster water access and expect carbon capture to improve at the same rate. The more useful goal may be to create materials that balance gas access, moisture response, and internal stability rather than maximising any one characteristic alone.

Durability Remains a Major Barrier

Although the results are promising, the materials are not yet ready for large-scale deployment. In their current form, both polymers are brittle and have only modest storage capacity. For moisture-swing capture systems to work economically in real conditions, materials would need to survive repeated wet-dry cycles over long periods, potentially on the order of tens of thousands or more.

That makes durability just as important as capture speed. A material that performs well initially but degrades under repeated swelling and shrinking would not be commercially useful. The study therefore highlights a central design challenge for this class of carbon removal technology: the best material must not only capture and release CO2 efficiently, but also stay stable over many years of operation.

Explore OneStop ESG Marketplace: Carbon capture

Why This Matters for Scalable Carbon Removal

The broader importance of the research is that it gives scientists a more practical design map for future direct air capture materials. Instead of treating moisture-driven capture as a purely chemical problem, the work shows that physical structure, pore pathways, and humidity-induced rearrangement are just as important.

That is especially relevant as carbon removal efforts move toward larger-scale deployment. Future systems will need materials that can operate with low energy use, maintain consistent performance, and withstand real-world atmospheric cycling without breaking down. Research like this helps shift the field closer to that goal by showing exactly where material performance begins to diverge and why.

A More Realistic Path Forward

The study does not solve the broader challenge of scalable carbon removal on its own, but it sharpens the engineering priorities. Future polymers will likely need to combine accessible gas pathways, carefully controlled moisture behaviour, and strong mechanical resilience. In other words, the next generation of carbon capture materials will need to be designed not just for chemistry, but for repeated use in real environments.

What emerges most clearly is that moisture may offer a lower-energy way to manage carbon capture, but structure decides whether that opportunity can be turned into a workable technology.

Subscribe to our newsletter for more insights, case studies, and ESG intelligence.

Explore ESG Solutions on our marketplace - OneStop ESG Marketplace.

Keep abreast of the top ESG Events on OneStop ESG Events.

OneStop ESG Educate: Your go-to source for top ESG courses and training programs tailored to your needs.

Stay informed with the latest insights on OneStop ESG News.

Discover meaningful career opportunities on OneStop ESG Jobs.