Elon Musk’s new government transparency initiative, the “Department of Government Efficiency” (Doge), has come under scrutiny after incorporating data from a controversial libertarian think tank with a long history of opposing climate policies.

Despite Musk’s claims that Doge would provide “maximum transparency” in its review of federal regulations, the initiative’s official website was initially empty. However, this week, it was updated to include:

A live feed from X (formerly Twitter)
A placeholder for identified cost savings, with a promised update by Valentine’s Day
A regulations page featuring data from the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI)

CEI’s Role and Controversial History

The Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) is a libertarian think tank known for opposing climate-focused regulations. Its “unconstitutionality index” measures government agency rules against laws passed by Congress, often arguing that federal regulations overstep legal boundaries.

CEI has been a longtime opponent of climate action, playing a key role in:

Blocking the 1997 Kyoto Protocol
Opposing the 2009 Waxman-Markey bill, which aimed to cap greenhouse gas emissions
Lobbying Trump to withdraw from the 2015 Paris Climate Agreement

The organization also ran ads disputing climate science, including a 2006 campaign countering Al Gore’s An Inconvenient Truth. One ad falsely claimed Antarctic ice was thickening, while another defended carbon dioxide as “essential to life” rather than a pollutant.

Ties to Fossil Fuel Interests

CEI has received substantial funding from fossil fuel-backed groups, including:

$900,000 from Koch-linked networks in 2020 (likely an underestimate due to undisclosed dark money contributions)
More than $640,000 from the Koch network between 1997 and 2015
Donations from Exxon and the American Petroleum Institute

The organization is also linked to the ultraconservative State Policy Network, which has backed anti-environmental policies and anti-protest laws targeting climate activists.

Criticism and Concerns Over Bias

Critics argue that Doge’s reliance on CEI’s data undermines its credibility. The think tank’s history of opposing climate regulations and ties to the fossil fuel industry raise concerns that Doge’s findings may be politically motivated rather than objective assessments of government inefficiency.