On May 22, 2025, the Trump Administration revoked Harvard University’s Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP) certification, a move that threatens the status of its 6,793 international students—27% of its student body. This decision, announced by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, bars Harvard from enrolling new international students on F-1 or J-1 visas and requires current ones to transfer or lose their legal status. Harvard swiftly filed a lawsuit, calling the action “unlawful” and “retaliatory,” and on May 23, a federal judge issued a temporary restraining order, halting enforcement pending legal proceedings. For students like Miguel, a Spanish PhD candidate, and Karl Molden, an Austrian sophomore, the uncertainty is paralyzing. As Harvard battles the administration, what does this mean for its global community, and could it reshape U.S. higher education?

The Revocation and Its Fallout

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) justified the revocation, claiming Harvard fostered “violence, antisemitism, and coordination with the Chinese Communist Party” and failed to provide requested records on international students’ protest activities and disciplinary histories. Noem’s letter, posted on X, cited a 55% campus crime spike from 2022-2023 and alleged Harvard hosted CCP paramilitary members, though no specific SEVP violations were detailed. Harvard was given 72 hours to submit extensive records—videos, audio, and five years of disciplinary data—to regain certification, a demand experts call unprecedented.

Harvard’s lawsuit argues the revocation violates its First Amendment rights and due process, as DHS provided no notice, evidence, or chance to respond, breaching SEVP regulations. The temporary injunction by Judge Allison Burroughs offers relief, but the legal fight could drag on, leaving students in limbo. If the revocation holds, Harvard’s 9,970 international academics, including 6,793 students, face transfer or deportation, disrupting research and education. International students contribute $44 billion annually to the U.S. economy, per NAFSA, and at Harvard, their full tuition—$63,000 yearly—bolsters its $53 billion endowment.

“This is retaliation for Harvard rejecting government control over our curriculum and governance,” said President Alan Garber. “Without international students, Harvard is not Harvard.”

Impact on Students

For students, the stakes are personal. Miguel, a first-year PhD student, fears losing years of research and his U.S. visa if forced to transfer. "We’ve made sacrifices to be here,” he said. “The uncertainty is terrifying.” Karl Molden, a sophomore, learned of the revocation while on vacation, unsure if he can return for fall. “Harvard’s been my life—friends, learning, everything. It’s falling apart,” he said. Both avoid international travel, fearing reentry bans, a concern echoed by Pierre Huguet of H&C Education, who advises preparing for worst-case scenarios.

The timing—days before May 2025 graduations—amplifies the chaos. A Canadian undergraduate told NPR her degree is at risk, while a European junior worries about summer internships. Students feel like “poker chips” in a political game, per Swedish student Leo Gerdén, dehumanized by a policy targeting Harvard’s defiance. The administration’s broader visa revocations, targeting pro-Palestinian protesters, have already chilled campus activism, with 60% of Jewish students reporting bias, per Harvard’s 2025 antisemitism study.

READ MORE: Antibiotic Runoff in Rivers: A Global Health Crisis Demanding Action

Why It’s Happening?

The revocation escalates a year-long clash. Since April 2025, the Trump Administration has frozen $2.7 billion in Harvard’s federal funding, threatened its tax-exempt status, and demanded it end DEI programs, ban protest masks, and disclose admissions data. Harvard’s refusal, citing academic freedom, prompted DHS’s April 16 records request for “illegal or violent” student activities, which Harvard partially fulfilled but deemed overly broad. Noem’s May 22 letter called Harvard’s response “insufficient,” triggering the SEVP revocation without citing specific legal breaches.

Critics see political motives. The administration frames Harvard as a hub of “anti-American” and “pro-terrorist” activity, pointing to pro-Palestinian protests post-October 2023. Noem’s claims of CCP ties, including Harvard’s $151 million in foreign donations since 2020, lack concrete SEVP relevance, per immigration attorney Charles Kuck. “This is retaliatory and poorly reasoned,” he said. Aaron Reichlin-Melnick of the American Immigration Council called it “weaponization of government,” noting no SEVP regulation justifies ideological purges.

The move aligns with Trump’s broader education crackdown. Columbia and other universities face similar probes, with Noem hinting at more SEVP revocations.

Challenges and Legal Outlook

Harvard’s lawsuit, filed May 23, argues DHS violated SEVP’s revocation process, which requires notice, evidence, and appeal—none provided. Judge Burroughs’ injunction, rooted in Harvard’s First Amendment claims, buys time, but a preliminary injunction is needed for long-term relief. Simon Marginson of Oxford predicts a “protracted” battle, citing Trump’s judicial influence. A separate California ruling by Judge Jeffrey White, blocking student visa terminations nationwide, bolsters Harvard’s case but doesn’t directly apply.

If the revocation stands, Harvard loses a quarter of its students, gutting programs like economics, where 40% of PhD candidates are international, per Harvard data. Research labs, clinics, and global dialogue suffer, per Garber, while future applicants may avoid Harvard, fearing instability. Financially, the loss of $400 million in annual international tuition stings, though less than at tuition-reliant schools.

Students face logistical nightmares. Transferring requires SEVP-certified schools—7,417 exist, per 2023 data—but top programs may lack spots mid-cycle. Visa transfers take 60-90 days, per ICE, risking gaps in legal status. Deportation looms for non-compliance, with 1,000 students already detained in 2024 for protest-related visa issues, per CNN.

What’s Next?

Harvard is mobilizing legal resources, leveraging its $53 billion endowment and congressional allies like Rep. Jaime Raskin, who called the revocation an “attack on academic freedom.” The university’s International Office is advising students to stay in the U.S. and await guidance. A win in court could restore SEVP status, but a loss might force mass transfers by September 2025, reshaping Harvard’s identity.

The broader implications are chilling. If DHS can revoke SEVP certification without evidence, other universities—Columbia was named by Noem—face similar risks. The U.S.’s appeal to 1.1 million global students, contributing $43 billion yearly, could wane, ceding ground to Canada and the UK. Pippa Norris of Harvard’s Kennedy School warned of diminished “soft power” and knowledge exchange.

“This is about more than Harvard,” said Arkesh Patel of Crimson Education. “It’s a signal to academia: comply or be punished.”

As Miguel and Molden await clarity, the fight tests Harvard’s resilience and U.S. higher education’s autonomy. Will the courts uphold academic freedom, or will political pressures redefine who can study in America?

Explore ESG Solutions on our marketplace - OneStop ESG Marketplace.

Keep abreast of the top ESG Events on OneStop ESG Events.

OneStop ESG Educate: Your go-to source for top ESG courses and training programs tailored to your needs.