Picture this: you’re booking a flight, and a pop-up asks if you’d like to offset your carbon footprint by saving a forest. It feels good, right? Your plane’s emissions, part of aviation’s 1 billion tons of CO2 yearly, get balanced by trees soaking up carbon. But a new study from Boston University and the Clean Air Task Force, released on May 18, 2025, pulls the curtain back on these forest carbon credits. Far too often, they’re not delivering the climate fix they promise, especially in North America’s voluntary market. With companies and airlines banking on credits to hit green goals, this gap is a big deal. So, what’s going wrong, and how can we make it right?

A System That Sounds Great but Falls Short

Forests are climate superheroes, storing 861 gigatons of carbon worldwide, more than twice what’s in the atmosphere, according to the FAO. Carbon credits aim to harness this power by paying landowners to keep trees standing, with each credit meant to cancel out one ton of CO2 emitted elsewhere. It’s a cornerstone of the $2 billion voluntary carbon market, used by airlines like Delta, which offset 13% of its 2023 flights, and firms chasing net-zero. But the study, led by Professor Lucy Hutyra and Rebecca Sanders-DeMott of the Clean Air Task Force, dug into 20 North American protocols—the rules behind these credits—and found most are flimsy.

Only one protocol, a new compliance-based system not yet active, got a “satisfactory” rating. None were “robust” or better.

“Some credits are dubious at best,” Hutyra said, pointing to a system where good intentions outrun real results.

Sanders-DeMott added, “The protocols are a weak link, putting the market’s integrity at risk.”

The problem isn’t the idea of forest credits but how they’re executed, with flaws that let companies claim green wins while emissions keep climbing.

READ MORE: Melting Glaciers Turn Mountain Wetlands into Mercury Hotspots

Where It’s Breaking Down?

The trouble starts with overoptimistic math. Protocols often assume forests will lock away carbon forever, ignoring risks like wildfires, which burned 4.2 million acres in California in 2020, or pests that kill trees. Buffer zones—extra forest areas meant as a backup—use outdated, low-ball risk estimates. A fire in one part of California isn’t the same as another, but protocols don’t adjust, leaving credits vulnerable.

"The buffer pool risks are way too conservative,” Hutyra explained, meaning a single disaster can wipe out a project’s promised carbon savings.

Then there’s the issue of “leakage.” Protect one forest, and loggers might just move to another, like deforestation hopping across borders. In 2023, 11% of global forest loss came from such shifts, per Global Forest Watch, but many protocols don’t track this, so the planet sees no net gain. Worse, some credits are just hot air, claiming carbon storage for forests already safe from logging, like those under legal protection. This over-crediting lets companies greenwash, papering over aviation’s 2.5% slice of global emissions, which is set to hit 1.7 gigatons by 2030, per the IEA.

Why This Matters?

The stakes couldn’t be higher. Forests are under siege—30% face deforestation risks, and wildfires in 2023 alone released 2.4 gigatons of CO2, per the WWF. Credits are supposed to help, but when they fail, they let emissions pile up while companies pat themselves on the back. Public trust is crumbling—only 27% of people believe corporate green claims, per a 2024 Edelman survey. With 83% of consumers demanding real climate action, according to a 2024 PwC survey, shaky credits threaten the $949 billion carbon market’s future. If we can’t trust the system, airlines and firms might ditch credits altogether, leaving forests and climate goals in the lurch.

Explore OneStop ESG Marketplace: Carbon capture

A Plan to Get Back on Track

The study doesn’t throw out the baby with the bathwater. Instead, it offers 22 ways to fix forest credits, blending quick fixes with bigger lifts. One urgent step is beefing up buffer zones with region-specific risk maps, using satellite data and AI tools like those from Sylvera to track wildfires or pests in real-time. Checking risks every five years would keep things current as climate change ramps up threats. These tweaks could roll out in a year, though they’d likely push credit prices from $5-$20 per ton to $10-$30, per McKinsey estimates.

Leakage needs a global fix. Tracking land-use changes with tech like Google Earth Engine could spot where deforestation shifts, and higher payments for leakage-free projects would reward real impact. Protocols must also stop over-crediting by only counting carbon from forests at genuine risk, verified by independent audits. The one “satisfactory” protocol does this with tough monitoring—others should follow. Transparency is key too: public, verified data on credit outcomes, shared via groups like the Integrity Council for the Voluntary Carbon Market, could rebuild faith.

Bigger changes, like global standards across voluntary and compliance markets, would take three to five years and cross-border cooperation. But they’re worth it—stronger protocols could protect 20% more forest carbon by 2030, per the Nature Conservancy, buying time for renewables to scale.

Looking Ahead

The Clean Air Task Force is pushing hard, turning the study into webinars, a simplified report, and pitches to protocol managers like the Verified Carbon Standard, which handles 40% of voluntary credits. They’re also eyeing California’s compliance market, a model for rigor. Even with U.S. federal climate support fading under 2025 policy shifts, voluntary markets can move fast. In 2024, forest credits were 15% of the $949 billion carbon market, and fixing them could unlock $100 billion more by 2030, per McKinsey.

There’s no sugarcoating the challenges. Higher credit prices could strain airlines, already hit by 10% airfare hikes in 2024, per IATA. Scaling tech and global tracking needs cash and diplomacy, which falters in tense trade climates. But the potential is huge. If forest credits can deliver, they’ll help forests stay climate heroes while giving airlines and companies a real path to net-zero. As Sanders-DeMott put it, “Forests are vital carbon sinks under threat. Fixing the market can mitigate climate change’s worst effects.” It’s time to stop settling for credits that don’t cut it and build a system that actually saves the planet.

Explore ESG Solutions on our marketplace - OneStop ESG Marketplace.

Keep abreast of the top ESG Events on OneStop ESG Events.

OneStop ESG Educate: Your go-to source for top ESG courses and training programs tailored to your needs.