In a major legal development, a federal judge has issued an injunction preventing the state of Texas from enforcing a controversial law that aimed to restrict proxy advisory firms from offering guidance related to diversity, equity, inclusion, and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues. The decision represents a temporary win for two of the world’s most prominent proxy advisers, Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) and Glass Lewis, who had filed lawsuits against the state citing First Amendment violations.

Legal Challenge Against Senate Bill 2237

The case centers on Senate Bill 2237, a law signed in June by Texas Governor Greg Abbott. The legislation sought to impose strict conditions on proxy advisers who provide recommendations to institutional investors during shareholder votes. Specifically, the law would have required advisers to state that any guidance related to DEI or ESG topics was not necessarily aligned with the financial interests of shareholders. In addition, it would have forced firms to provide detailed financial justification for such recommendations.

Proxy advisers argued that the law was politically motivated and imposed unconstitutional restrictions on their speech. They said it would effectively compel them to adopt the ideological positions of the state, particularly on contentious topics like sustainability and social justice, which have become increasingly polarized in the U.S. political landscape.

Court Grants Injunction Against Enforcement

On Friday, U.S. District Judge Alan Albright, based in Austin, granted preliminary injunctions against the Texas Attorney General’s office. The decision halts enforcement of the law while the case moves forward, preventing any immediate regulatory penalties against the firms for continuing their standard advisory practices.

READ MORE: Democratic Financial Officials Reaffirm ESG Commitments in Letter to Asset Managers

In their lawsuit filed on July 24, ISS and Glass Lewis accused Texas officials of violating their right to free expression. They argued that forcing them to include disclaimers and extra analysis when discussing DEI or ESG matters amounted to unconstitutional compelled speech.

Texas Defends the Law as Neutral and Necessary

The office of Attorney General Ken Paxton defended the legislation, stating that it did not take sides but rather ensured that shareholders received factual, financially grounded information when making investment decisions. According to the state’s position, the law was a neutral effort to uphold fiduciary responsibility and maintain transparency in shareholder communications.

Paxton's office argued in court filings that neither ISS nor Glass Lewis had demonstrated clear harm to their business operations or client relationships. The defense maintained that requiring additional disclosures should not be considered a political act, but rather a safeguard for investors.

Growing Political Pressure on DEI and ESG Practices

The court ruling comes at a time when environmental and social governance frameworks have become a focal point of political debate across the country. Conservative lawmakers and advocacy groups have increasingly opposed the incorporation of ESG metrics in business and investment decisions, calling them ideological overreaches that distract from core financial performance.

Proxy advisers like ISS and Glass Lewis, which support the use of ESG data in evaluating board decisions, executive compensation, and shareholder proposals, have found themselves at the center of this clash. Both firms insist that their advice is grounded in empirical analysis and that it serves the long-term interests of their clients.

Companies Reassess Commitments Amid Backlash

In response to mounting political scrutiny, many companies have begun scaling back public commitments to DEI and ESG programs. Former President Donald Trump, now campaigning again, has made it a central issue in his platform, calling for the elimination of such initiatives within corporate America and government.

Despite this shifting climate, both ISS and Glass Lewis reaffirmed their support for providing investors with insights that include non-financial factors. In separate statements following the judge’s ruling, the firms emphasized their dedication to objectivity, transparency, and helping clients meet their fiduciary obligations.

Proxy Advisers Remain Influential

Glass Lewis currently counts over 1,300 institutional clients, while ISS advises approximately 2,000. These organizations wield significant influence during annual shareholder meetings, offering recommendations on board elections, governance practices, mergers, and proposals related to climate and social impact. Their analyses often shape how large investment funds vote, making them key players in the corporate decision-making ecosystem.

Explore OneStop ESG Marketplace: Corporate ESG consulting

A Test Case for National Policy

Legal experts believe the Texas case could serve as an important precedent in defining how far states can go in regulating investment guidance and corporate governance advice. While the injunction is only preliminary, it highlights the constitutional tensions emerging as political movements challenge the role of ESG in financial markets.

For now, the judge's decision allows proxy advisers to continue offering ESG and DEI-related recommendations without the constraints that Texas sought to impose. However, the broader debate over the intersection of politics, regulation, and responsible investing shows no sign of fading, and more legal battles may soon follow in other jurisdictions.

Explore ESG Solutions on our marketplace - OneStop ESG Marketplace.

Keep abreast of the top ESG Events on OneStop ESG Events.

OneStop ESG Educate: Your go-to source for top ESG courses and training programs tailored to your needs.

Stay informed with the latest insights on OneStop ESG News.

Discover meaningful career opportunities on OneStop ESG Jobs.