The European Commission has unveiled a series of revisions to the EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR), proposing lighter compliance requirements for small companies, micro-operators, and downstream manufacturers, even as it confirmed plans to proceed with the law’s rollout by the end of this year. The new measures aim to simplify implementation and address capacity concerns but have already drawn criticism from environmental groups who warn they could weaken one of Europe’s most ambitious environmental trade laws.

Simplifying Compliance, Extending Timelines

Under the updated plan, the EUDR will still enter into force in late 2025, but with a six-month grace period for large companies and a full two-year delay for small enterprises, which will now be covered only from the end of 2026. The Commission’s revision significantly streamlines due diligence obligations. Only the primary importer or operator placing a product on the EU market will now be required to submit a due diligence statement. Retailers and downstream manufacturers such as chocolate producers using imported cocoa will no longer have to file separate submissions for the same commodity. The new approach is designed to reduce duplication and administrative burden across supply chains. For micro and small producers in low-risk countries, the process will require only a one-time registration in the EUDR IT system, removing the need for regular compliance filings. According to the Commission, this change will cover nearly 100% of EU farmers and foresters, who are classified as small operators and therefore fall under the simplified regime.

“This approach provides certainty and stability, streamlining the tracking process for micro and small producers who, while individually posing little risk, collectively provide critical data for maintaining traceability,” said Teresa Ribera, EU Commission Executive Vice-President for Clean, Just and Competitive Transition.

Read more: Tokyo to Issue World’s First Certified Climate Resilience Bond to Fund Disaster Adaptation Projects

Balancing Ambition with Practicality

The EUDR, first proposed in 2021, seeks to ensure that commodities such as beef, palm oil, coffee, cocoa, soy, rubber, and timber and their derived products like chocolate, leather, tires, and furniture are deforestation-free and compliant with producer-country laws. Companies are required to trace products to their point of origin and prove that the land used was not cleared after December 31, 2020. However, industry groups and several member states have raised alarms over the readiness of the EU’s centralized IT tracking system, warning that it may not handle the enormous volume of data required for geolocation and traceability. In September, Commissioner Jessika Roswall proposed a one-year delay for implementation, citing these technological and administrative challenges. The Commission now insists that the system will be ready on schedule, but the revised framework reflects a compromise relieving smaller market actors of the heaviest reporting load while keeping overall enforcement on track.

Political and Practical Pressures

The EUDR has been under political pressure from both industry and member states. In earlier votes, Members of the European Parliament rejected the law’s risk benchmarking system, which classifies countries based on deforestation risk. Some lawmakers argued that certain regions should be labeled “no risk,” exempting them from stringent checks. The Commission’s latest proposal attempts to address those concerns without fully reopening the law. By reducing obligations for low-risk countries and smaller operators, Brussels hopes to ensure smooth compliance while maintaining oversight of high-risk imports. However, these revisions must still be approved by the European Parliament and Council. The Commission urged lawmakers to move quickly, warning that further delays could jeopardize the regulation’s rollout timeline.

Explore OneStop ESG Marketplace: Regulation and Compliance

Environmental Groups Warn of Weakened Safeguards

Environmental organizations have condemned the amendments as a retreat from the EU’s climate and biodiversity commitments. In a sharply worded statement, the WWF called the proposal “a shameful surrender to political pressure,” arguing that the exemptions will “significantly increase risks of deforestation and illegality in supply chains.”

“The Commission may win a few political points, but the losers are clear: companies that have invested in deforestation-free supply chains and forests that continue vanishing at a breathtaking pace,” said Anke Schulmeister-Oldenhove, Senior Forest Policy Officer at WWF European Policy Office. “Forests are not bargaining chips. They are essential to climate stability, biodiversity, and human rights protection.”

What Comes Next?

The proposal will now move to Parliament and Council negotiations for formal adoption. In parallel, the Commission is preparing contingency plans should the updated framework not be approved in time. While the new rules aim to strike a balance between environmental ambition and administrative feasibility, the debate highlights a deeper challenge: how to build deforestation-free trade without overburdening small actors or undermining the urgency of protecting the world’s remaining forests. As Ribera emphasized, the Commission’s goal remains “to ensure a seamless launch that allows large operators to adapt progressively while giving small producers more time to adjust.” Yet for environmental advocates, the question now is whether simplification risks becoming dilution and whether the EU can uphold its promise to keep imported deforestation out of its borders without compromise.

Explore ESG Solutions on our marketplace - OneStop ESG Marketplace.

Keep abreast of the top ESG Events on OneStop ESG Events.

OneStop ESG Educate: Your go-to source for top ESG courses and training programs tailored to your needs.

Stay informed with the latest insights on OneStop ESG News.

Discover meaningful career opportunities on OneStop ESG Jobs.