Executive pay has once again taken center stage in European boardrooms, as a growing number of shareholders push back against what they see as misaligned and overly generous compensation plans. New data from corporate governance advisory firm Georgeson reveals a sharp uptick in investor opposition across some of the continent’s largest stock markets.

Remuneration Plans Face Rising Dissent

According to Georgeson’s latest analysis, 37.9 percent of major European firms that presented future executive pay policies for shareholder approval in 2025 faced more than 10 percent opposition. That figure is up from 30.7 percent the previous year and reflects a 23 percent increase in the number of companies targeted by dissatisfied investors.

This year marks a turning point. For the first time, more shareholders opposed forward-looking remuneration policies than retrospective pay reports for the previous year. These votes, though typically non-binding, are sending a loud message to boards across Europe.

Blue-Chip Firms Not Immune

Well-known companies found themselves in the crosshairs. In the UK, InterContinental Hotels Group received just under 70 percent shareholder approval for its proposed executive pay plan. In Italy, only 66.5 percent of investors supported UniCredit’s compensation framework. These are not isolated cases.

Read more: Singapore Postpones Climate Reporting for Smaller Companies to Ease Transition

Six out of the nine major European markets tracked by Georgeson, including France, Germany, Belgium, and the Netherlands, saw increased shareholder dissent. Spain led the wave of resistance, with more than half of votes cast showing opposition to remuneration proposals.

Shift Toward More Confrontational Tactics

Cas Sydorowitz, CEO of Georgeson Global, noted a shift in strategy among shareholders. “Investors appear more willing to challenge executive pay through a more confrontational and disruptive approach,” he said. “By voting against binding remuneration policy resolutions, they are taking aim at the very structure of future compensation packages, including long-term incentive plans.”

The implications of these votes can be significant. Persistent opposition has, in several cases, forced boards to revise or even withdraw proposals, particularly when long-term incentive plans are perceived as too generous or lacking robust performance criteria.

Calls for Stricter Performance Alignment

Louise Dudley, portfolio manager at Federated Hermes, said the backlash reflects a growing discomfort with pay structures that reward executives too easily. Concerns include performance awards that vest too quickly and weak requirements for executives to retain significant ownership stakes in the company.

Yousif Ebeed, who leads corporate governance at Schroders, added that investor support hinges on whether performance targets are ambitious and closely linked to company results. Without this alignment, shareholders are increasingly willing to withhold their approval.

Explore OneStop ESG Marketplace: Corporate Sustainability Consulting

The Road Ahead: Reform or Repetition?

As scrutiny of corporate governance deepens, executive pay remains a flashpoint in the debate over corporate accountability and ESG performance. Shareholders are signaling they will no longer accept business as usual when it comes to boardroom compensation.

Companies hoping to win back investor trust may need to revisit their long-term incentives, strengthen performance metrics, and ensure leadership rewards truly reflect shareholder value creation.

Explore ESG Solutions on our marketplace - OneStop ESG Marketplace.

Keep abreast of the top ESG Events on OneStop ESG Events.

OneStop ESG Educate: Your go-to source for top ESG courses and training programs tailored to your needs.

Stay informed with the latest insights on OneStop ESG News.

Discover meaningful career opportunities on OneStop ESG Jobs.